The diplomatic repercussions of the vote in France to criminalize denying the Armenian Genocide have been substantial, but so are the domestic benefits.
Lawmakers in France's lower house last week voted to make it a crime to deny the Turkish Ottoman genocide of Armenians in 1915, citing human rights and the protection of memory. Violators will receive?a one-year jail sentence and a nearly $70,000 fine.?
Skip to next paragraphDiplomatic fallout has been severe, with Turkey withdrawing its ambassador to France amid an angry nationalist backlash. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said French massacres in colonial Algeria were themselves a genocide, and has since vowed ?retribution? for the French law that treats with an issue in Turkey that has never been resolved.
But France?s righteous ire about the Armenian genocide couldn?t mostly be about French politics, about currying favor with an estimated 500,000 Armenian heritage French ahead of a tight election, could it?
Consider some relevant data points: In 2001, just ahead of national elections, France officially recognized the Armenian genocide. In fall 2006, again just before the elections that brought President Nicolas Sarkozy into office, French politicians threatened to criminalize the denial of the genocide of Armenians with a five-year prison sentence. Now, just ahead of presidential elections this spring, President Sarkozy?s ruling party led the first-time law to criminalize denying the 1915 genocide. * Correction: The original text misstated when France officially recognized the Armenian genocide.
Never mind that the French foreign minister registered a dissenting opinion over the law, passed on Dec. 22, and that French historians have disagreed with legislating truth on an event less clear than the Holocaust of mid-20th century. Or that the law may well not pass the French Senate when it is debated next year. Or that the Armenian patriarch in Turkey said this week he?d rather the French let the issue be worked out in Turkey, where it remains an unresolved and contentious issue.
?The law is complicating the work of Turkish progressives who have been trying to get Turkish society to address what actually happened in their history. That?s the saddest part,? says Karim Emile Bitar, a senior fellow at the Institute for International and Strategic Relations in Paris. ?The most sensible intellectuals on the issue are being trampled in Turkey.?
Some 20 nations have passed resolutions condemning the Armenian genocide. But while individuals in some nations can be prosecuted for denying mass crimes against humanity or on anti-racial grounds, or for denying the Jewish Holocaust, France may be the first to criminalize the Armenian genocide.
The late Turkish writer and leading intellectual Hrant Dink, who did more than anyone to raise the issue of the massacre and deportations of anywhere from?700,000 to 1.5 million Armenians, said of the French proposed laws in 2006 that he?d rather dance up the Champs-?lys?es denying the genocide than see the law passed in France.
Documentation of the genocide, which took place during or under cover of World War I, is substantial. The historical consensus is that a genocide ? as defined by the United Nations as the ?intent to destroy in whole or in part? an ethnic or religious peoples ? happened. The US ambassador to the Ottoman Empire at the time, Henry Morgenthau, Sr., was distraught at the scale of the inhumanity, and wrote prolifically about the details in cables and articles. Yet the carnage was ignored for years as an inconvenient truth or lost in the overall shock of World War I ? and earned the title of ?the forgotten genocide.?
mike rowe pro bowl 2012 ron artest deion sanders shld 2012 sec football schedule medifast
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.