Friday, December 16, 2011

"Virtual visits" unpopular among cancer survivors (Reuters)

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) ? In a new survey of breast cancer survivors, few people said that having a follow-up appointment with a doctor or nurse over the phone or online instead of in person would ease their stress and worry.

Some researchers believe so-called virtual visits might be an option for continuing care as the number of cancer survivors in the United States grows and cancer doctors are stretched increasingly thin.

"There's been a lot of interest in introducing virtual visits into medical oncology follow-up," said study co-author Dr. Erica Mayer, from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.

"What we had in mind was a way in which patients and physicians could communicate with each other and discuss routine non-urgent follow-up care in a (way) that would be safe and acceptable."

Mayer told Reuters Health that phone or online appointments wouldn't be a replacement for physical exams or cancer screening that's done during in-person visits, but rather a way for survivors who are doing well and might live far from a clinic to have regular, convenient check-ins. It would also ease the strain on the medical system, Mayer said.

She and her colleagues sent surveys to 218 breast cancer survivors who had been seen at their center. In the surveys, they asked patients about their comfort with getting follow-up care from cancer doctors, primary care doctors and nurse practitioners, as well as over the phone or Internet with a doctor or nurse.

Survivors said that of those options, a visit to a cancer doctor would be the most likely to decrease their appointment-related stress and their worry about cancer. The most participants -- almost 80 percent -- pointed to those appointments as likely to increase their survival.

More than half of people also said that visiting a primary care doctor or nurse practitioner would decrease their disease-related worrying and would likely extend their lifespan.

But survivors were much less confident about benefiting from a virtual visit.

Only 12 percent of survey participants said communicating with a cancer doctor or nurse on the phone or online would relieve their stress about the follow-up "visit." Twenty percent said it would decrease their cancer worrying and improve their survival. More survivors said the visits would increase their stress and worrying and likely cut their lifespan.

"When patients first hear, 'Oh, we can do a follow-up from your house, you don't even have to come in,' it might seem like they're not getting as good care," said Dr. Christine Hill-Kayser, a radiation oncologist at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, who was not involved in the new study.

The idea of the virtual visit is still a pretty new one, Hill-Kayser said, and the phone or online sessions -- using Skype, for instance -- aren't something most survivors have access to yet.

She said that in the future, researchers and doctors will have to do a better job of educating patients about the benefits of virtual visits and being clear about what they involve. Ultimately, she added, online follow-up is a promising option to help keep survivors and their medical team better connected.

"There's some potential benefit to being able to be in touch with survivors more often and in a way that's more convenient for them," Hill-Kayser told Reuters Health.

"We're certainly working in an environment with limited resources. It's sometimes difficult to schedule follow-ups as much as we'd like to with all our patients."

Mayer said that because the survey had to be brief, the researchers weren't able to fully explain what might go into a virtual visit, and that could have colored survivors' opinions of them.

Her team wrote in the Journal of Clinical Oncology that the survey did show survivors would be comfortable having follow-up care led by their primary care doctors and by nurse practitioners -- not only cancer doctors.

That's in line with research showing that survivors do just as well in those cases, Mayer pointed out, which may help shape the future picture of cancer survivor care.

"Establishing new and efficient models of care that involve sharing care among providers or even introducing an Internet option would be favorable and helpful moving forward," she concluded.

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/ur2jbD Journal of Clinical Oncology, online December 12, 2011.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/health/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111215/hl_nm/us_virtual_cancer_survivors

krill oil black friday 2011 rhodium uppity uppity stuffing brandon mcinerney

Howard Steven Friedman: Stop Searching for Super

I was in the supermarket a few days ago and came across a bag of goji berries. The bag was proudly labeled as a Superfood. Now, I know Americans love a good advertising pitch as much as a simple solution to a complicated problem, but, I have bad news for you... there is no Easter Bunny, no Santa Claus, and there are no Superfoods that will let you miraculously eat whatever you want and still be healthy. Blueberries, pomegranate juice, goji berries, green tea, seaweed, fish oil and nuts are all good things to eat but no single food is going to enable you to eat whatever else you want and still have the body of a world-class athlete. But we love the idea of Superfoods because it is a simple solution to the difficult challenge of maintaining good health.

Thinking about Superfoods brought me to more Supers in the American fantasy mind. We of course have Superman, fighting for truth, justice and the American way. Alas, there is no Superman to solve our current political problems though many perpetually hope that latest newcomer on the political scene will save America from its own destruction. For fun, Google the name of any recent president and Superman to see the rather impressive number of images that people have created either in adoration or to mock political leaders.

From Superfoods to Superman, I soon found myself thinking about the Super Committee. This latest example of politicians being unwilling to develop legislation to solve the countries issues was a prime example of passing the buck. Responsibility to develop legislation to successfully manage the budget was handed from group to group until landing in the arms of six members of the House and six members of the Senate. This Super Committee was going to save America's financial future by hashing out a reasonable set of compromises to have a functional government that balances the desires of most of the people. Unfortunately, the Super Committee accomplished nothing.

My thoughts on Superfoods, Superman, and Super Committees are pretty much the same. It's nice to pretend that there are simple solutions to complicated problems but I live in the real world. In the real world you need to diet and exercise to get in shape. In the real world, no one is going to protect America by flying around in a cape. And in the real world, if you want politicians to take any meaningful action, then you need to make sure that they realize that inaction will lead to them losing the privilege of representing you.

?

Follow Howard Steven Friedman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/howardsfriedman

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/howard-steven-friedman/stop-searching-for-super_b_1144669.html

victoria secret angels fox 4 fox 4 adam levine vs fashion show 2011 victoria secret fashion show beverly hills hotel

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Supreme Court was Right to Decline Public School Worship Case (ContributorNetwork)

COMMENTARY | As a Christian, I enjoy the right to pray to and serve the God I believe in where ever and whenever I want. I have prayed with others and will continue to -- even in public places. I believe this is a right granted to all Americans through freedom of religion, regardless of what religion they believe.

However, I think that the Supreme Court was right to decline taking the Bronx Household of Faith's appeal, as reported by Reuters. The justices were asked to review a ruling by the U.S. appeals court, which upheld the New York City Board of Education policy against religious worship at its schools. The Bronx Household of Faith and about 60 other church congregations have been allowed to use public school classrooms and auditoriums for worship after school hours and on weekends following an injunction that allowed this to take place. The appeals court set aside this injunction.

According to the attorney for the religious group, the policy against religious worship was viewpoint discrimination and authorized censorship of private religious speakers.

I disagree. I think the Constitution, under freedom of religion, allows for individuals in public places such as school to say the name of God, provided they don't force others to. It even allows for people to come together and pray in a variety of circumstances, provided they're not compelling others to.

But just individuals would not want the state to tell them what religion they should subscribe to, nor should the taxpayers in New York be on the hook for financing the facilities of any particular religion. A public school is not a church and it should not be.

Having regularly held worship services for one particular religion inside of a public school is basically saying this particular religion's "church" is housed at the school. It is placing the costs of maintaining the facilities of said "church" -- including utilities and maintenance -- on the shoulders of the state by way of the public's tax money, a public that may or may not wish to fund the upkeep of this church's facilities.

And that, as far as I can tell, muddies the separating line between church and state as much as anything could.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/education/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20111205/pl_ac/10605625_supreme_court_was_right_to_decline_public_school_worship_case

nhl realignment long island serial killer kristin chenoweth country music awards new earth heisman light year

Lars von Trier won't be tried over Nazi comments (Reuters)

LOS ANGELES (TheWrap.com) ? French authorities who filed charges against director Lars von Trier no longer plan to prosecute him for remarks he made about Nazis at a Cannes Film Festival press conference in May.

"In my clear opinion von Trier should not be prosecuted," Grasse public prosecutor Jean-Michel Cailleau told the Danish daily Politiken earlier this week.

Cailleau said his recommendation to drop the charges had been forwarded to the French Ministry of Justice, which would make its final decision within a couple of weeks.

In a subsequent report, the Hollywood Reporter claimed the case had been officially closed.

In August, Grasse authorities had charged von Trier with violating a French law that prohibits anyone from justifying war crimes by "glorifying, praising or at least presenting the crimes in question favorably."

The crime carried a possible sentence of five years in jail.

At Cannes, von Trier joked about learning that he had German ancestry.

"I found out I was actually a Nazi," he said. "My family was German...which gave me some pleasure. I understand Hitler. He certainly did some wrong things, but I can imagine him sitting in his bunker toward the end Now how can I get out of this sentence. OK, I'm a Nazi."

After the press conference, von Trier was declared persona non grata by Cannes officials. In October, he was interviewed by Danish police at the behest of the Grasse authorities, who subsequently decided not to pursue the case.

The day he was interviewed by police, von Trier issued a release in which he vowed to no longer make any public statements.

"As a result of this serious indictment I must infer that I do not have the capacity to express myself unambiguously," he said. "I have therefore decided that from today I will refrain from all public statements."

Kirsten Dunst was named Best Actress at Cannes for von Trier's film "Melancholia." On Saturday, the film won the top prize at the European Film Awards.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/movies/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111206/film_nm/us_larsvontrier

make your mark stop loss stop loss thurston moore the island the island mcdonalds beating

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Correction: Obit-Ken Russell story (AP)

LONDON ? In a Nov. 28 obituary on filmmaker Ken Russell, The Associated Press, relying on information from his son Alex Verney-Elliott, erroneously reported that he had died in a hospital. His son now confirms that he was mistaken and that Russell died at his home in southern England.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/obits/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111205/ap_en_ot/eu_obit_ken_russell_corrective_corrective

rocky horror picture show rutgers risky business weather nj weather nj nyc weather nyc weather

Monday, December 5, 2011

Epigenetics Offers New Clues to Mental Illness (preview)

Feature Articles | Mind & Brain Cover Image: December 2011 Scientific American MagazineSee Inside

Experience may contribute to mental illness in a surprising way: by causing "epigenetic" changes?ones that turn genes on or off without altering the genes themselves


Image: Photograph by Plamen Petkov

In Brief

  • New findings suggest that experiences can contribute to mental illness by adding or removing ?epigenetic? marks on chromosomes. These tags are particular chem?icals that can influence gene activity without changing the information encoded in the genes.
  • Studies in mice demonstrate a role for long-lasting epigenetic modifications in such disorders as addiction and depression.
  • Epigenetic changes can also affect maternal behaviors in ways that reproduce the same behaviors in their offspring, even though the changes are not passed down through the germ line.
  • Researchers hope the new findings will lead to better treatments, although the path to those treatments is not yet obvious.

Matt is a history teacher. his twin brother, greg, is a drug addict. (Their names have been changed to protect their anonymity.) Growing up in the Boston area, both boys did well in high school: they were strong students in the classroom and decent athletes on the field, and they got along with their peers. Like many young people, the brothers snuck the occasional beer or cigarette and experimented with marijuana. Then, in college, they tried cocaine. For Greg, the experience derailed his life.


Articles You Might Also Like

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=7ac5524dacf526f1981fe6e5d0d60da4

nl mvp nl mvp verlander verlander patriots new england patriots justin verlander

Source: Havelange resigns from IOC

(AP) ? Longtime Brazilian member Joao Havelange has resigned from the IOC, just days before facing suspension in a corruption case stemming from his days as president of FIFA, the Associated Press has learned.

A person familiar with the case says the 95-year-old Havelange ? the International Olympic Committee's longest-serving member ? submitted his resignation by letter Thursday.

The person spoke to the AP on Sunday on condition of anonymity because Havelange's decision has been kept confidential.

The move came a few days before the IOC executive board was due to sanction Havelange in the ISL kickbacks case. Havelange, an IOC member since 1963, faced a long suspension or even possible expulsion for allegedly receiving $1 million from FIFA's former marketing agency.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/347875155d53465d95cec892aeb06419/Article_2011-12-04-OLY-IOC-Havelange-Resigns/id-2e06768caef34a0b815f00a09c5f667f

chelsea clinton kat von d tiki barber minnesota vikings packers vs vikings packers vs vikings randall cobb